[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171023121240.GE29656@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:12:40 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi-nor: intel-spi: Fix Kconfig dependency to LPC_ICH
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 09:38:57PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> > Also, the 'depends on EXPERT' statement looks misplaced,
> > enabling EXPERT should only be there to allow you to turn
> > extra things *off*, not to hide device drivers.
> >
>
> I will leave this to Mika to comment the "EXPERT" usage. If we remove
> this, I think that should be another patch and the documentation of
> this driver should be updated too.
Yeah, I guess we can remove that EXPERT dependency. It was added there
exactly because I did not want ordinary users playing with the device
and inadvertently overwrite their BIOSes (if it is not protected). I
also agree it should be a separate patch. Do you want to do that or
should I?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists