linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi-nor: intel-spi: Fix Kconfig dependency to LPC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEUhbmXfN1VG8n=z4Ck-UCFqG8oT2ffaxb410v+j6OiibV2_ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:08:20 +0800
From:   Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi-nor: intel-spi: Fix Kconfig dependency to LPC_ICH

Hi Mika,

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 09:38:57PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
>> > Also, the 'depends on EXPERT' statement looks misplaced,
>> > enabling EXPERT should only be there to allow you to turn
>> > extra things *off*, not to hide device drivers.
>> >
>>
>> I will leave this to Mika to comment the "EXPERT" usage. If we remove
>> this, I think that should be another patch and the documentation of
>> this driver should be updated too.
>
> Yeah, I guess we can remove that EXPERT dependency. It was added there
> exactly because I did not want ordinary users playing with the device
> and inadvertently overwrite their BIOSes (if it is not protected). I
> also agree it should be a separate patch. Do you want to do that or
> should I?

Thanks. I can prepare a patch to remove EXPERT.

Regards,
Bin