[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171023134401.n5mx6f6gjfhxtnxu@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:44:01 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen-tpmfront: Combine two condition checks into one
statement in vtpm_send()
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 01:30:46PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:15:16 +0200
>
> A return was performed with the same error code after two condition checks.
> Thus use a single statement instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c b/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c
> index 873a5631937a..0d02743e7a87 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c
> @@ -82,10 +82,7 @@ static int vtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
> u32 ordinal;
> unsigned long duration;
>
> - if (offset > PAGE_SIZE)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - if (offset + count > PAGE_SIZE)
> + if (offset > PAGE_SIZE || offset + count > PAGE_SIZE)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /* Wait for completion of any existing command or cancellation */
> --
> 2.14.2
>
This is fine.
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists