[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f68ee5b6-2da1-e3c8-4d0d-f13a0563385e@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:57:30 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen-tpmfront: Use common error handling code in
vtpm_send()
>> @@ -108,11 +106,14 @@ static int vtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
>> if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, VTPM_STATUS_IDLE, duration,
>> &priv->read_queue, true) < 0) {
>> /* got a signal or timeout, try to cancel */
>> - vtpm_cancel(chip);
>> - return -ETIME;
>> + goto cancel_vtpm;
>> }
>>
>> return count;
>> +
>> +cancel_vtpm:
>> + vtpm_cancel(chip);
>> + return -ETIME;
>> }
>>
>> static int vtpm_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
>> --
>> 2.14.2
>>
>
> NAK
Do you need any more facts to show the influence of the proposed small code reduction?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists