[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201710241856.M1LDhOUO%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:41:08 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: "Bruno E. O. Meneguele" <brdeoliv@...hat.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, serge@...lyn.com,
james.l.morris@...cle.com, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com,
zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, jeyu@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ima: check signature enforcement against cmdline
param instead of CONFIG
Hi Bruno,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.14-rc6 next-20171018]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Bruno-E-O-Meneguele/ima-change-how-MODULE_SIG_FORCE-is-checked-on-modules-checking-policy/20171024-105837
config: i386-randconfig-x0-10241354 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.o: In function `ima_read_file':
>> ima_main.c:(.text+0x98e): undefined reference to `is_module_sig_enforced'
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (26036 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists