lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:39:10 -0600 From: Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx@...fish-solutions.com> To: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca> Cc: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.com>, Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [5/5] e1000e: Avoid receiver overrun interrupt bursts > On Oct 24, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 09:41:02PM +0200, Benjamin Poirier wrote: >> On 2017/09/19 12:38, Philip Prindeville wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> We’ve been running this patchset (all 5) for about as long as they’ve been under review… about 2 months. And in a burn-in lab with heavy traffic. >>> >>> We’ve not seen a single link-flap in hundreds of ours of saturated traffic. >>> >>> Would love to see some resolution soon on this as we don’t want to ship a release with unsanctioned patches. >>> >>> Is there an estimate on when that might be? >> >> The patches have been added to Jeff Kirsher's next-queue tree. I guess >> they will be submitted for v4.15 which might be released in early >> 2018... >> http://phb-crystal-ball.org/ > > And then they will be submitted to linux-stable so this long standing > regression can be fixed, right? > Let’s hope! -Philip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists