[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86efprfywz.fsf@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:51:24 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <jason@...edaemon.net>,
<gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
<sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
<thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
<miquel.raynal@...e-electrons.com>, <nadavh@...vell.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp: add missing spin_lock init
On Wed, Oct 25 2017 at 9:23:26 am BST, Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> A spin lock is used in the irq-mvebu-gicp driver, but it is never
> initialized. This patch adds the missing spin_lock_init() call in the
> driver's probe function.
>
> Fixes: a68a63cb4dfc ("irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp: Add new driver for Marvell GICP")
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c
> index b283fc90be1e..17a4a7b6cdbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c
> @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static int mvebu_gicp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> gicp->dev = &pdev->dev;
> + spin_lock_init(&gicp->spi_lock);
>
> gicp->res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> if (!gicp->res)
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Thomas, can you please queue this ASAP?
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists