[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171025144625.5f5me7mpuv4uo7nt@salmiak>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:46:26 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/27] x86: assembly, make some functions local
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 04:21:48PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/06/2017, 03:21 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > If the aim of this series is to introduce something that architectures
> > use consistently, then can we please actually poke other architectures
> > about it? e.g. send this to linux-arch, with a cover letter explaining
> > the idea and asking maintainers to take a look.
>
> Sure, with v5, I will.
Thanks; that's much appreciated, and I look forward to it!
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists