linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.13 85/85] xfs: move two more RT specific functions into CONFIG_XFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2017 23:09:50 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.13 85/85] xfs: move two more RT specific functions into CONFIG_XFS_RT

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 4.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> commit 785545c8982604fe3ba79d16409e83993be77d5e upstream.
>
> The last cleanup introduced two harmless warnings:
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c:480:1: warning: '__xfs_getfsmap_rtdev' defined but not used
> fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c:372:1: warning: 'xfs_getfsmap_rtdev_rtbitmap_helper' defined but not used
>
> This moves those two functions as well.
>
> Fixes: bb9c2e543325 ("xfs: move more RT specific code under CONFIG_XFS_RT")

I haven't checked what kernel contains bb9c2e543325, but if I remember correctly
the warning only showed up during the 4.14-rc cycle, so unless you backported
bb9c2e543325 or I misremembered it, backporting my fix would be wrong.

I lost remote access to my build box, so I can't verify at the moment.
Can you double-check that we want this backport?

          Arnd