linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.13 85/85] xfs: move two more RT specific functions into CONFIG_XFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171026070913.GB27323@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2017 09:09:13 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.13 85/85] xfs: move two more RT specific functions into
 CONFIG_XFS_RT

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:09:50PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > 4.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >
> > commit 785545c8982604fe3ba79d16409e83993be77d5e upstream.
> >
> > The last cleanup introduced two harmless warnings:
> >
> > fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c:480:1: warning: '__xfs_getfsmap_rtdev' defined but not used
> > fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c:372:1: warning: 'xfs_getfsmap_rtdev_rtbitmap_helper' defined but not used
> >
> > This moves those two functions as well.
> >
> > Fixes: bb9c2e543325 ("xfs: move more RT specific code under CONFIG_XFS_RT")
> 
> I haven't checked what kernel contains bb9c2e543325, but if I remember correctly
> the warning only showed up during the 4.14-rc cycle, so unless you backported
> bb9c2e543325 or I misremembered it, backporting my fix would be wrong.
> 
> I lost remote access to my build box, so I can't verify at the moment.
> Can you double-check that we want this backport?

Yes, that patch is part of the xfs patch series that is in this -rc
release before your fixup patch here.  So all should be good, thanks for
checking.

greg k-h