[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQMTptVYLu10uF+85OsuANbC7Fo0heD4t1ybpUE6Yh-gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:49:28 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: make DEBUG_FILE option more useful
Hi Julia,
2017-10-15 18:55 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>:
> Make coccicheck checked for the existence of DEBUG_FILE on each semantic
> patch, and bailed if it already existed. This meant that DEBUG_FILE was
> useless for checking more than one semantic patch at a time. Now the check
> is moved to the start of make coccicheck, and the 2> is changed to a 2>> to
> append to the file on each semantic patch. Furthermore, the spatch command
> that is run for each semantic patch is also added to the DEBUG_FILE, to
> make clear what each stdout trace corresponds to.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
I think this is a good improvement,
and looks almost good to me.
Just one nit.
>
> }
>
> +if [ "$DEBUG_FILE" != "/dev/null" -a "$DEBUG_FILE" != "" ]; then
> + if [ -f $DEBUG_FILE ]; then
> + echo "Debug file $DEBUG_FILE exists, bailing"
> + exit
> + fi
> + touch $DEBUG_FILE
I think this "touch" is redundant.
If the DEBUG_FILE does not exist, 2>> will automatically create it.
> +else
> + DEBUG_FILE="/dev/null"
> +fi
> +
> if [ "$COCCI" = "" ] ; then
> for f in `find $srctree/scripts/coccinelle/ -name '*.cocci' -type f | sort`; do
> coccinelle $f
>
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists