[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5rwU+qR4yAM9rZEtPTygOi0xceiqgcTz3Yoe8H6e-OUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 19:00:57 -0700
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Tech Board Discuss
<tech-board-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Kernel Summit Discussions
<ksummit-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] Linux Foundation Technical
Advisory Board election results 2017
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 5:23 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 10/26/17 00:14, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>
>>> It was a very close election, with the next candidate on the list
>>> receiving 36 votes.
>>
>> Do we have a procedure in place in case the tie that we only avoided by one
>> vote would have happened ?
>>
>
> In that case thw winner(s) would be drawn randomly. The scanning tool
> scripts actually assigns each candidate a tiebreaker number via
> /dev/urandom, but we have not yet decided if we would do that or, for
> example, a physical coin toss.
Once upon a time, Heinlein, it was, I think, suggested that a
candidate for office be
picked entirely randomly from the pool. The lottery concept - the idea
that if you ran,
you had a small chance of serving no matter the popular vote - encouraged
participation.
>
> We have had ties in the past, and had one this time too, but none that
> has ever crossed the cut line.
>
> -hpa
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tech-board-discuss mailing list
> Tech-board-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/tech-board-discuss
--
Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619
Powered by blists - more mailing lists