[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171026135614.GA12359@nazgul.tnic>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:56:14 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Gary Hook <gary.hook@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Part2 PATCH v6 13/38] crypto: ccp: Add Secure Encrypted
Virtualization (SEV) command support
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:57:04PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> Calling PLATFORM_GET_STATUS is not required, we can manage the state through
> a simple ref count variable. Issuing PSP commands will always be much more
> expensive compare to accessing a protected global variable.
What does "protected" mean here?
In any case, that variable can be a simple bool as you use it as such.
> I would prefer to avoid invoking PSP command if possible.
> Additionally, the global semaphore is still needed to serialize
> the sev_platform_init() and sev_platform_shutdown() from multiple
> processes. e.g If process "A" calls sev_platform_init() and if it gets
> preempted due to whatever reason then we don't want another process
> to issue the shutdown command while process "A" is in middle of
> sev_platform_init().
How? You're holding fw_init_mutex.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists