[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171026135825.GA16528@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:58:25 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pids: introduce find_get_task_by_vpid helper
On 10/26, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> There are several functions that do find_task_by_vpid() followed by
> get_task_struct(). We can use a helper function instead.
Yes, agreed, I was going to do this many times.
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -870,12 +870,7 @@ static struct task_struct *futex_find_get_task(pid_t pid)
> {
> struct task_struct *p;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - p = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
> - if (p)
> - get_task_struct(p);
> -
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + p = find_get_task_by_vpid(pid);
>
> return p;
OK, but then I think you should remove futex_find_get_task() and convert
it callers to use the new helper.
> @@ -1103,11 +1103,7 @@ static struct task_struct *ptrace_get_task_struct(pid_t pid)
> {
> struct task_struct *child;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - child = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
> - if (child)
> - get_task_struct(child);
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + child = find_get_task_by_vpid(pid);
>
> if (!child)
> return ERR_PTR(-ESRCH);
The same. ptrace_get_task_struct() should die imo.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists