lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:50:55 +0200
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jiangyilism@...il.com" <jiangyilism@...il.com>,
        "nab@...ux-iscsi.org" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
        "viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        "Jason@...c4.com" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "target-devel@...r.kernel.org" <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "varun@...lsio.com" <varun@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iscsi-target: Convert timers to use timer_setup()

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 10:24 +0200, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 16:10 +0200, Kees Cook wrote:
>> > > However, maintainers: sorry to send this one -- it can't be merged
>> > > yet, this uses timer_setup_on_stack() which is only in -next right
>> > > now. If it looks okay, though, I can carry this in the timer tree.
>> >
>> > Hello Kees,
>> >
>> > Can you have a look at the following patch and queue it before your
>> > patch if you think this would be useful (this patch has been tested):
>> > "target/iscsi: Simplify timer manipulation code"
>> > (https://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg15385.html).
>>
>> This looks good, yeah. Can you resend it with me CCed? It doesn't look
>> like it was CCed to lkml, so it's not easy to for me to add it to me
>> tree.
>
> OK, I will resend that patch as a reply to this e-mail. BTW, I just finished
> retesting that patch on top of v4.14-rc6.

Thanks for the testing!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ