[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26694.1509030144@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:02:24 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: joeyli <jlee@...e.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, matthew.garrett@...ula.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jforbes@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/27] kexec_file: Disable at runtime if securelevel has been set
joeyli <jlee@...e.com> wrote:
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG) &&
> + !is_ima_appraise_enabled() &&
> + kernel_is_locked_down("kexec of unsigned images"))
This doesn't seem right. It seems that you can then kexec unsigned images
into a locked-down kernel if IMA appraise is enabled.
I think the commit message needs expansion as to why it's okay. Can you also
do it as an additional patch rather than altering the original IMA-less patch
7?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists