lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:28:43 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>,
        Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
        Pirama Arumuga Nainar <pirama@...gle.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Mark Charlebois <charlebm@...il.com>,
        Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
        Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@...tec.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: fix linker feature test macros when cross
 compiling with Clang

+ linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> I do not like to add $(CLANG_TARGET) to a place for common helpers.
> Instead of $(CLANG_TARGET), please add
> $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(CC_OPTION_CFLAGS)
> to cc-ldoption and ld-option.

Thanks for the review.  I agree that sounds like a better option.

> I have two requests next time:
>   - please include  linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org in your To list

Sure thing. scripts/get_maintainer.pl does not recommend that list for
this file; is there a way to explicitly add that list to the
recommendation for that source file?

>   - please base your patch on linux-kbuild/kbuild branch

Will do. Do I need to note it's based off that branch? Otherwise wont
0-day bot complain that my patch doesn't apply/build on torvalds/linux
?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ