[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdnjvVQDyQChkg0Td1w7XoMDJiHf07oKMf815dFoMYFEPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:10:24 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
Pirama Arumuga Nainar <pirama@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mark Charlebois <charlebm@...il.com>,
Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@...tec.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>, arve@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: fix linker feature test macros when cross
compiling with Clang
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>> - please base your patch on linux-kbuild/kbuild branch
>
> Will do. Do I need to note it's based off that branch? Otherwise wont
> 0-day bot complain that my patch doesn't apply/build on torvalds/linux
> ?
Talked to some teammates about this, sounds like it's not a problem,
so I'll just send v2 with a note to the reviewer.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists