lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b99ee29b-0d57-2eda-652f-dca549cdb554@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:28:06 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>, <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        <chao@...nel.org>, <yunlong.song@...oud.com>
CC:     <miaoxie@...wei.com>, <bintian.wang@...wei.com>,
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] f2fs: support soft block reservation

On 2017/10/27 11:11, Yunlong Song wrote:
> It renames reserved_blocks sysfs interface to target_reserved_blocks,
> and supports to extend it to be soft threshold, which allows user
> configure it exceeding current available user space. So this patch
> also introduces a new sysfs interface called current_reserved_blocks to
> show the current blocks which have already been reserved.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h                          | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  fs/f2fs/super.c                         |  5 +++--
>  fs/f2fs/sysfs.c                         | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
>  4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> index 11b7f4e..482d78b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> @@ -134,11 +134,22 @@ Contact:	"Sheng Yong" <shengyong1@...wei.com>
>  Description:
>  		 Controls the injection type.
>  
> -What:		/sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/reserved_blocks
> +What:		/sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/target_reserved_blocks

For backward compatibility, how about keep this interface name, instead
just update its description?

Thanks,

>  Date:		June 2017
>  Contact:	"Chao Yu" <yuchao0@...wei.com>
>  Description:
> -		 Controls current reserved blocks in system.
> +		 Controls target reserved blocks in system, the threshold
> +		 is soft, it could exceed current available user space.
> +
> +What:		/sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/current_reserved_blocks
> +Date:		October 2017
> +Contact:	"Yunlong Song" <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
> +Contact:	"Chao Yu" <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> +Description:
> +		 Shows current reserved blocks in system, it may be temporarily
> +		 smaller than target_reserved_blocks, but will gradually
> +		 increase to target_reserved_blocks when more free blocks are
> +		 freed by user later.
>  
>  What:		/sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/gc_urgent
>  Date:		August 2017
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 13a96b8..c26fccb 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1081,7 +1081,8 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
>  	block_t total_valid_block_count;	/* # of valid blocks */
>  	block_t discard_blks;			/* discard command candidats */
>  	block_t last_valid_block_count;		/* for recovery */
> -	block_t reserved_blocks;		/* configurable reserved blocks */
> +	block_t target_reserved_blocks;		/* configurable reserved blocks */
> +	block_t current_reserved_blocks;	/* current reserved blocks */
>  
>  	u32 s_next_generation;			/* for NFS support */
>  
> @@ -1557,7 +1558,8 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  
>  	spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>  	sbi->total_valid_block_count += (block_t)(*count);
> -	avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count - sbi->reserved_blocks;
> +	avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count -
> +					sbi->current_reserved_blocks;
>  	if (unlikely(sbi->total_valid_block_count > avail_user_block_count)) {
>  		diff = sbi->total_valid_block_count - avail_user_block_count;
>  		*count -= diff;
> @@ -1591,6 +1593,10 @@ static inline void dec_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, sbi->total_valid_block_count < (block_t) count);
>  	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, inode->i_blocks < sectors);
>  	sbi->total_valid_block_count -= (block_t)count;
> +	if (sbi->target_reserved_blocks &&
> +		sbi->current_reserved_blocks < sbi->target_reserved_blocks)
> +		sbi->current_reserved_blocks = min(sbi->target_reserved_blocks,
> +					sbi->current_reserved_blocks + count);
>  	spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>  	f2fs_i_blocks_write(inode, count, false, true);
>  }
> @@ -1737,7 +1743,7 @@ static inline int inc_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  	spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>  
>  	valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count + 1;
> -	if (unlikely(valid_block_count + sbi->reserved_blocks >
> +	if (unlikely(valid_block_count + sbi->current_reserved_blocks >
>  						sbi->user_block_count)) {
>  		spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>  		goto enospc;
> @@ -1780,6 +1786,9 @@ static inline void dec_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  
>  	sbi->total_valid_node_count--;
>  	sbi->total_valid_block_count--;
> +	if (sbi->target_reserved_blocks &&
> +		sbi->current_reserved_blocks < sbi->target_reserved_blocks)
> +		sbi->current_reserved_blocks++;
>  
>  	spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>  
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 213d2c1..c682978 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static int f2fs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
>  	buf->f_blocks = total_count - start_count;
>  	buf->f_bfree = user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi) + ovp_count;
>  	buf->f_bavail = user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi) -
> -						sbi->reserved_blocks;
> +						sbi->current_reserved_blocks;
>  
>  	avail_node_count = sbi->total_node_count - F2FS_RESERVED_NODE_NUM;
>  
> @@ -2457,7 +2457,8 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>  	sbi->total_valid_block_count =
>  				le64_to_cpu(sbi->ckpt->valid_block_count);
>  	sbi->last_valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count;
> -	sbi->reserved_blocks = 0;
> +	sbi->target_reserved_blocks = 0;
> +	sbi->current_reserved_blocks = 0;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < NR_INODE_TYPE; i++) {
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sbi->inode_list[i]);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> index e09e59c..568e32f 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ enum {
>  	FAULT_INFO_RATE,	/* struct f2fs_fault_info */
>  	FAULT_INFO_TYPE,	/* struct f2fs_fault_info */
>  #endif
> -	RESERVED_BLOCKS,
> +	RESERVED_BLOCKS,	/* struct f2fs_sb_info */
>  };
>  
>  struct f2fs_attr {
> @@ -114,6 +114,12 @@ static ssize_t features_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>  	return len;
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t current_reserved_blocks_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> +					struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, char *buf)
> +{
> +	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n", sbi->current_reserved_blocks);
> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t f2fs_sbi_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>  			struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, char *buf)
>  {
> @@ -153,12 +159,13 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>  #endif
>  	if (a->struct_type == RESERVED_BLOCKS) {
>  		spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> -		if ((unsigned long)sbi->total_valid_block_count + t >
> -				(unsigned long)sbi->user_block_count) {
> +		if (t > (unsigned long)sbi->user_block_count) {
>  			spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
>  		*ui = t;
> +		sbi->current_reserved_blocks = min(sbi->target_reserved_blocks,
> +				sbi->user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi));
>  		spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>  		return count;
>  	}
> @@ -272,7 +279,8 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_feature_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>  F2FS_RW_ATTR(SM_INFO, f2fs_sm_info, reclaim_segments, rec_prefree_segments);
>  F2FS_RW_ATTR(DCC_INFO, discard_cmd_control, max_small_discards, max_discards);
>  F2FS_RW_ATTR(DCC_INFO, discard_cmd_control, discard_granularity, discard_granularity);
> -F2FS_RW_ATTR(RESERVED_BLOCKS, f2fs_sb_info, reserved_blocks, reserved_blocks);
> +F2FS_RW_ATTR(RESERVED_BLOCKS, f2fs_sb_info, target_reserved_blocks,
> +							target_reserved_blocks);
>  F2FS_RW_ATTR(SM_INFO, f2fs_sm_info, batched_trim_sections, trim_sections);
>  F2FS_RW_ATTR(SM_INFO, f2fs_sm_info, ipu_policy, ipu_policy);
>  F2FS_RW_ATTR(SM_INFO, f2fs_sm_info, min_ipu_util, min_ipu_util);
> @@ -293,6 +301,7 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_feature_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>  F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(dirty_segments);
>  F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(lifetime_write_kbytes);
>  F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(features);
> +F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(current_reserved_blocks);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FS_ENCRYPTION
>  F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR(encryption, FEAT_CRYPTO);
> @@ -337,7 +346,8 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_feature_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>  	ATTR_LIST(dirty_segments),
>  	ATTR_LIST(lifetime_write_kbytes),
>  	ATTR_LIST(features),
> -	ATTR_LIST(reserved_blocks),
> +	ATTR_LIST(target_reserved_blocks),
> +	ATTR_LIST(current_reserved_blocks),
>  	NULL,
>  };
>  
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ