lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171027110626.GB96994@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:06:26 +0200
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc:     Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>, chao@...nel.org,
        yunlong.song@...oud.com, miaoxie@...wei.com,
        bintian.wang@...wei.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] f2fs: support soft block reservation

On 10/27, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/10/27 11:11, Yunlong Song wrote:
> > It renames reserved_blocks sysfs interface to target_reserved_blocks,
> > and supports to extend it to be soft threshold, which allows user
> > configure it exceeding current available user space. So this patch
> > also introduces a new sysfs interface called current_reserved_blocks to
> > show the current blocks which have already been reserved.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h                          | 15 ++++++++++++---
> >  fs/f2fs/super.c                         |  5 +++--
> >  fs/f2fs/sysfs.c                         | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
> >  4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> > index 11b7f4e..482d78b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> > @@ -134,11 +134,22 @@ Contact:	"Sheng Yong" <shengyong1@...wei.com>
> >  Description:
> >  		 Controls the injection type.
> >  
> > -What:		/sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/reserved_blocks
> > +What:		/sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/target_reserved_blocks
> 
> For backward compatibility, how about keep this interface name, instead
> just update its description?

Good catch. It makes sense to keep the entry name. :)

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> >  Date:		June 2017
> >  Contact:	"Chao Yu" <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> >  Description:
> > -		 Controls current reserved blocks in system.
> > +		 Controls target reserved blocks in system, the threshold
> > +		 is soft, it could exceed current available user space.
> > +
> > +What:		/sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/current_reserved_blocks
> > +Date:		October 2017
> > +Contact:	"Yunlong Song" <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
> > +Contact:	"Chao Yu" <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> > +Description:
> > +		 Shows current reserved blocks in system, it may be temporarily
> > +		 smaller than target_reserved_blocks, but will gradually
> > +		 increase to target_reserved_blocks when more free blocks are
> > +		 freed by user later.
> >  
> >  What:		/sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/gc_urgent
> >  Date:		August 2017
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index 13a96b8..c26fccb 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -1081,7 +1081,8 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
> >  	block_t total_valid_block_count;	/* # of valid blocks */
> >  	block_t discard_blks;			/* discard command candidats */
> >  	block_t last_valid_block_count;		/* for recovery */
> > -	block_t reserved_blocks;		/* configurable reserved blocks */
> > +	block_t target_reserved_blocks;		/* configurable reserved blocks */
> > +	block_t current_reserved_blocks;	/* current reserved blocks */
> >  
> >  	u32 s_next_generation;			/* for NFS support */
> >  
> > @@ -1557,7 +1558,8 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >  
> >  	spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> >  	sbi->total_valid_block_count += (block_t)(*count);
> > -	avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count - sbi->reserved_blocks;
> > +	avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count -
> > +					sbi->current_reserved_blocks;
> >  	if (unlikely(sbi->total_valid_block_count > avail_user_block_count)) {
> >  		diff = sbi->total_valid_block_count - avail_user_block_count;
> >  		*count -= diff;
> > @@ -1591,6 +1593,10 @@ static inline void dec_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >  	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, sbi->total_valid_block_count < (block_t) count);
> >  	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, inode->i_blocks < sectors);
> >  	sbi->total_valid_block_count -= (block_t)count;
> > +	if (sbi->target_reserved_blocks &&
> > +		sbi->current_reserved_blocks < sbi->target_reserved_blocks)
> > +		sbi->current_reserved_blocks = min(sbi->target_reserved_blocks,
> > +					sbi->current_reserved_blocks + count);
> >  	spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> >  	f2fs_i_blocks_write(inode, count, false, true);
> >  }
> > @@ -1737,7 +1743,7 @@ static inline int inc_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >  	spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> >  
> >  	valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count + 1;
> > -	if (unlikely(valid_block_count + sbi->reserved_blocks >
> > +	if (unlikely(valid_block_count + sbi->current_reserved_blocks >
> >  						sbi->user_block_count)) {
> >  		spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> >  		goto enospc;
> > @@ -1780,6 +1786,9 @@ static inline void dec_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >  
> >  	sbi->total_valid_node_count--;
> >  	sbi->total_valid_block_count--;
> > +	if (sbi->target_reserved_blocks &&
> > +		sbi->current_reserved_blocks < sbi->target_reserved_blocks)
> > +		sbi->current_reserved_blocks++;
> >  
> >  	spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> >  
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index 213d2c1..c682978 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static int f2fs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
> >  	buf->f_blocks = total_count - start_count;
> >  	buf->f_bfree = user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi) + ovp_count;
> >  	buf->f_bavail = user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi) -
> > -						sbi->reserved_blocks;
> > +						sbi->current_reserved_blocks;
> >  
> >  	avail_node_count = sbi->total_node_count - F2FS_RESERVED_NODE_NUM;
> >  
> > @@ -2457,7 +2457,8 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> >  	sbi->total_valid_block_count =
> >  				le64_to_cpu(sbi->ckpt->valid_block_count);
> >  	sbi->last_valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count;
> > -	sbi->reserved_blocks = 0;
> > +	sbi->target_reserved_blocks = 0;
> > +	sbi->current_reserved_blocks = 0;
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < NR_INODE_TYPE; i++) {
> >  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sbi->inode_list[i]);
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > index e09e59c..568e32f 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ enum {
> >  	FAULT_INFO_RATE,	/* struct f2fs_fault_info */
> >  	FAULT_INFO_TYPE,	/* struct f2fs_fault_info */
> >  #endif
> > -	RESERVED_BLOCKS,
> > +	RESERVED_BLOCKS,	/* struct f2fs_sb_info */
> >  };
> >  
> >  struct f2fs_attr {
> > @@ -114,6 +114,12 @@ static ssize_t features_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> >  	return len;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static ssize_t current_reserved_blocks_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> > +					struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n", sbi->current_reserved_blocks);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static ssize_t f2fs_sbi_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> >  			struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, char *buf)
> >  {
> > @@ -153,12 +159,13 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> >  #endif
> >  	if (a->struct_type == RESERVED_BLOCKS) {
> >  		spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> > -		if ((unsigned long)sbi->total_valid_block_count + t >
> > -				(unsigned long)sbi->user_block_count) {
> > +		if (t > (unsigned long)sbi->user_block_count) {
> >  			spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> >  			return -EINVAL;
> >  		}
> >  		*ui = t;
> > +		sbi->current_reserved_blocks = min(sbi->target_reserved_blocks,
> > +				sbi->user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi));
> >  		spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> >  		return count;
> >  	}
> > @@ -272,7 +279,8 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_feature_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> >  F2FS_RW_ATTR(SM_INFO, f2fs_sm_info, reclaim_segments, rec_prefree_segments);
> >  F2FS_RW_ATTR(DCC_INFO, discard_cmd_control, max_small_discards, max_discards);
> >  F2FS_RW_ATTR(DCC_INFO, discard_cmd_control, discard_granularity, discard_granularity);
> > -F2FS_RW_ATTR(RESERVED_BLOCKS, f2fs_sb_info, reserved_blocks, reserved_blocks);
> > +F2FS_RW_ATTR(RESERVED_BLOCKS, f2fs_sb_info, target_reserved_blocks,
> > +							target_reserved_blocks);
> >  F2FS_RW_ATTR(SM_INFO, f2fs_sm_info, batched_trim_sections, trim_sections);
> >  F2FS_RW_ATTR(SM_INFO, f2fs_sm_info, ipu_policy, ipu_policy);
> >  F2FS_RW_ATTR(SM_INFO, f2fs_sm_info, min_ipu_util, min_ipu_util);
> > @@ -293,6 +301,7 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_feature_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> >  F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(dirty_segments);
> >  F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(lifetime_write_kbytes);
> >  F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(features);
> > +F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(current_reserved_blocks);
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FS_ENCRYPTION
> >  F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR(encryption, FEAT_CRYPTO);
> > @@ -337,7 +346,8 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_feature_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> >  	ATTR_LIST(dirty_segments),
> >  	ATTR_LIST(lifetime_write_kbytes),
> >  	ATTR_LIST(features),
> > -	ATTR_LIST(reserved_blocks),
> > +	ATTR_LIST(target_reserved_blocks),
> > +	ATTR_LIST(current_reserved_blocks),
> >  	NULL,
> >  };
> >  
> > 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ