[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ac2c392-3ec2-4656-a185-6c9c554b8b2e@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 01:41:42 +0100
From: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, <peterhuewe@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update TPM driver infrastructure changes
Hi,
Am Freitag, 29. September 2017 22:23:13 CEST schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 08:29:09AM +0000, Peter.Huewe@...ineon.com wrote:
>>> ...
>> Spinics is archiving us at
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-integrity/
>>
>> It would be good to add this to the vger page + documented on
>> the wiki, which should be added to MAINTAINERS.
>> http://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_Kernel_Integrity as wiki page
>>
>>
>> Peter ...
>
> Can you submit a follow-up patch that adds this information?
I added the information to the kernsec wiki at
http://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_Kernel_Integrity
However, since your MAINTAINERS patch is neither upstream, nor in any of
your
branches (next / master) I cannot send an update.
About the wiki - I added quite a few other links, especially about tpm 2.0.
If anyone wants to have any information added, please let me know.
I definitely would like to extend the wiki usage.
So if you have any documents, e.g.
- about how the patch flow is/should be,
- how stuff gets tested
- subsystem specific rules
- subsystem architecuture
but also links to interesting pages/projects PLEASE let me know.
Thanks,
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists