[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171103142107.gdlooejtpehfkeez@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 16:21:07 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
Cc: zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update TPM driver infrastructure changes
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 01:41:42AM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, 29. September 2017 22:23:13 CEST schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 08:29:09AM +0000, Peter.Huewe@...ineon.com wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > Spinics is archiving us at
> > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-integrity/
> > >
> > > It would be good to add this to the vger page + documented on the
> > > wiki, which should be added to MAINTAINERS.
> > > http://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_Kernel_Integrity as wiki page
> > >
> > >
> > > Peter ...
> >
> > Can you submit a follow-up patch that adds this information?
>
> I added the information to the kernsec wiki at
> http://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_Kernel_Integrity
>
> However, since your MAINTAINERS patch is neither upstream, nor in any of
> your
> branches (next / master) I cannot send an update.
>
> About the wiki - I added quite a few other links, especially about tpm 2.0.
> If anyone wants to have any information added, please let me know.
>
> I definitely would like to extend the wiki usage.
> So if you have any documents, e.g. - about how the patch flow is/should be,
> - how stuff gets tested
> - subsystem specific rules
> - subsystem architecuture
>
> but also links to interesting pages/projects PLEASE let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
Looks good to me.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists