[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdavwWk4LBEzm3=0K1kMx2Nc4SoYE0kZw3pqDcfr9-st+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 09:44:40 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] pinctrl: sunxi: Introduce the strict flag
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> Our pinctrl device should have had strict set all along. However, it wasn't
> the case, and most of our old device trees also have a pinctrl group in
> addition to the GPIOs properties, which mean that we can't really turn it
> on now.
>
> All our new SoCs don't have that group, so we should still enable that mode
> on the newer one though.
>
> In order to enable it by default, add a flag that will allow to disable
> that mode that should be set by pinctrl drivers that cannot be migrated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists