lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfAzk4n1HQETp+r5KGE5B_HmQ0JcsOwesvowuvt=wju5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2017 16:07:25 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform: x86: dell-smo8800: remove redundant assignments
 to byte_data

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 October 2017 15:47:58 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
>> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>> >
>> > Variable byte_data is being initialized and re-assigned with values that
>> > are never read. Remove these as these redundant assignments. Cleans up
>> > clang warning:
>> >
>> > drivers/platform/x86/dell-smo8800.c:106:2: warning: Value stored to 'byte_data'
>> > is never read
>>
>> Thanks for the patch.
>>
>> As I read a code it was from the beginning like this. I dunno what was
>> a motivation of this pieces, thus I would like to hear Pali.
>
> IIRC this part of code comes from the lis3lv* driver which was used for
> HP EliteBook machines. As both drivers provides similar interface for
> userspace.

OK, though it doesn't clarify the intention of the byte_data
(useless?) assignments.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ