lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171031121958.7c0e3ab4@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2017 12:19:58 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     changbin.du@...el.com
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing: Allocate mask_str buffer dynamically

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:20:28 +0800
changbin.du@...el.com wrote:

> From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>
> 
> The default NR_CPUS can be very large, but actual possible nr_cpu_ids
> usually is very small. For my x86 distribution, the NR_CPUS is 8192 and
> nr_cpu_ids is 4. About 2 pages are wasted.
> 
> Most machines don't have so many CPUs, so define a array with NR_CPUS
> just wastes memory. So let's allocate the buffer dynamically when need.
> 
> The exact buffer size should be:
>   DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_cpu_ids, 4) + nr_cpu_ids/32 + 2;
> 
> Example output:
>   ff,ffffffff
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>
> 
> ---
> v2:
>   - remove 'static' declaration.
>   - fix buffer size.
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 752e5da..6b70648 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -4184,31 +4184,33 @@ static const struct file_operations show_traces_fops = {
>   */
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(tracing_cpumask_update_lock);

The above mutex was used to protect mask_str.

>  
> -/*
> - * Temporary storage for the character representation of the
> - * CPU bitmask (and one more byte for the newline):
> - */
> -static char mask_str[NR_CPUS + 1];
> -
>  static ssize_t
>  tracing_cpumask_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
>  		     size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>  {
>  	struct trace_array *tr = file_inode(filp)->i_private;
> +	char *mask_str;
>  	int len;
>  
> +	/* Bitmap, ',' and two more bytes for the newline and '\0'. */
> +	len = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_cpu_ids, 4) + nr_cpu_ids/32 + 2;
> +	mask_str = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!mask_str)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  	mutex_lock(&tracing_cpumask_update_lock);

This patch can remove the mutex as well, since there's no sharing of
the mask anymore.

-- Steve

>  
> -	len = snprintf(mask_str, count, "%*pb\n",
> +	len = snprintf(mask_str, len, "%*pb\n",
>  		       cpumask_pr_args(tr->tracing_cpumask));
>  	if (len >= count) {
>  		count = -EINVAL;
>  		goto out_err;
>  	}
> -	count = simple_read_from_buffer(ubuf, count, ppos, mask_str, NR_CPUS+1);
> +	count = simple_read_from_buffer(ubuf, count, ppos, mask_str, len);
>  
>  out_err:
>  	mutex_unlock(&tracing_cpumask_update_lock);
> +	kfree(mask_str);
>  
>  	return count;
>  }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ