linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] NAND: Optimize NAND_ECC_HW_OOB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANc+2y4aLytChOjkMXBu92O+pfiZPP3AwXgu4XF1EkBsULv+2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2017 21:50:32 +0530
From:   PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@...il.com>
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Marek Vašut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] NAND: Optimize NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST read

Hi Boris,

On 30 October 2017 at 19:04, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
<prasannatsmkumar@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On 30 October 2017 at 18:33, Boris Brezillon
> <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yep, it makes sense to have that one applied too, but this is pretty
>> much the same problem: it will conflict with the ->exec_op() rework.
>
> True. I did realise that.
>
>> Can you please send it to the ML so I can track it in patchwork and
>
> Sure.

I could not get that patch compiled yet. I will revisit it next week
and send the patch.

Regards,
PrasannaKumar