linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/23] 4.9.60-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171031170125.2sddnk3w77vtgo64@sirena.co.uk>
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:01:25 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/23] 4.9.60-stable review

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 05:52:38PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 08:22:06AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:

> >         at91-sama5d2_xplained: 1 failed lab
> >         at91-sama5d3_xplained: 1 failed lab
> >         sun8i-h3-orangepi-pc: 1 failed lab

> This seems like a lot of failed labs, anything I should be worried
> about?

It's all one lab, a quick poll of results seems to suggest that lab is
having a bad day and some of the boards have booted in other labs so I'd
not worry.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)