[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171031185505-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 19:06:05 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: "Hatayama, Daisuke" <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "'marcandre.lureau@...hat.com'" <marcandre.lureau@...hat.com>,
"'somlo@....edu'" <somlo@....edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'qemu-devel@...gnu.org'" <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] RFC: fw_cfg: add DMA write operation in sysfs
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 09:55:39AM +0000, Hatayama, Daisuke wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org
> > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 1:19 AM
> > To: Hatayama, Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>
> > Cc: 'marcandre.lureau@...hat.com' <marcandre.lureau@...hat.com>;
> > 'somlo@....edu' <somlo@....edu>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > 'qemu-devel@...gnu.org' <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] RFC: fw_cfg: add DMA write operation in sysfs
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:07:20AM +0000, Hatayama, Daisuke wrote:
> > > > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@...hat.com>
> > > >
> > > > Since qemu 2.9, DMA write operations are allowed. However, usage of this
> > > > interface from kernel or user-space is strongly discouraged by the
> > > > maintainers. This patch is meant for experimentations for now.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Could you (or maintainers?) tell me how experimental the DMA write
> > > operations from kernel are?
> > >
> > > From some technical reason?
> > > Or simply there has not been enough test yet so far?
> >
> > The concern is security, talking from userspace to hypervisor
> > might become a trivial DOS vector.
> >
> > If there's need for a specific entry to be accessible from userspace,
> > I'd rather white-list it.
> >
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
> If so, I guess the white-list is done in userspace qemu side,
> and no additional change would be needed for this kernel-side patch set for the white-list feature.
> Is this understanding correct?
No - host side has no idea whether it's guest userspace or
kernel initiating the access.
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@...hat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> > b/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> > > > index 54b569da3257..e2f2ad1c9c0c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> > > > @@ -524,9 +524,28 @@ static ssize_t fw_cfg_sysfs_read_raw(struct file *filp,
> > struct kobject *kobj,
> > > > return fw_cfg_read_blob(entry->f.select, buf, pos, count, true);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static ssize_t fw_cfg_sysfs_write_raw(struct file *filp, struct kobject
> > *kobj,
> > > > + struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> > > > + char *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct fw_cfg_sysfs_entry *entry = to_entry(kobj);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!fw_cfg_dma_enabled())
> > > > + return -ENOTSUPP;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (pos > entry->f.size)
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (count > entry->f.size - pos)
> > > > + count = entry->f.size - pos;
> > > > +
> > > > + return fw_cfg_write_blob(entry->f.select, buf, pos, count);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static struct bin_attribute fw_cfg_sysfs_attr_raw = {
> > > > - .attr = { .name = "raw", .mode = S_IRUSR },
> > > > + .attr = { .name = "raw", .mode = S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR },
> > > > .read = fw_cfg_sysfs_read_raw,
> > > > + .write = fw_cfg_sysfs_write_raw,
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > --
> > > > 2.14.1.146.gd35faa819
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > HATAYAMA, Daisuke
> > >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists