lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1k1zb8b9n.fsf@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2017 13:42:12 -0400
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
Cc:     "martin.petersen\@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "keescook\@chromium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "varun\@chelsio.com" <varun@...lsio.com>,
        "target-devel\@vger.kernel.org" <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jiangyilism\@gmail.com" <jiangyilism@...il.com>,
        "nab\@linux-iscsi.org" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] target/iscsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()


Bart,

> The tree I tested indeed includes that rebased patch. BTW, since the code
> touched by that patch has not been modified in the past months, the rebased
> patch is identical to the patch I posted in May 2017.

OK. Just checking.

So what's the plan here? Should both patches be routed through the timer
tree?

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ