lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJNabMzjCSwFjaaF6VcBBD57gG9FgXTBgAHCmbKcb_AHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:12:29 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "varun@...lsio.com" <varun@...lsio.com>,
        "target-devel@...r.kernel.org" <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jiangyilism@...il.com" <jiangyilism@...il.com>,
        "nab@...ux-iscsi.org" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] target/iscsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Martin K. Petersen
<martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> Bart,
>
>> The tree I tested indeed includes that rebased patch. BTW, since the code
>> touched by that patch has not been modified in the past months, the rebased
>> patch is identical to the patch I posted in May 2017.
>
> OK. Just checking.
>
> So what's the plan here? Should both patches be routed through the timer
> tree?

That was my plan. Does that sound okay?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ