linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] target/iscsi: Convert timers to use timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:12:29 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "varun@...lsio.com" <varun@...lsio.com>,
        "target-devel@...r.kernel.org" <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jiangyilism@...il.com" <jiangyilism@...il.com>,
        "nab@...ux-iscsi.org" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] target/iscsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Martin K. Petersen
<martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> Bart,
>
>> The tree I tested indeed includes that rebased patch. BTW, since the code
>> touched by that patch has not been modified in the past months, the rebased
>> patch is identical to the patch I posted in May 2017.
>
> OK. Just checking.
>
> So what's the plan here? Should both patches be routed through the timer
> tree?

That was my plan. Does that sound okay?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security