[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171031194252.GA21223@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 20:42:52 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Meyer <Paul.Meyer@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv: kvp: Avoid reading past allocated blocks from KVP
file
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 06:10:00PM +0000, Long Li wrote:
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 1:43 AM
> > To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> > Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang
> > <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>;
> > devel@...uxdriverproject.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Paul Meyer
> > <Paul.Meyer@...rosoft.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv: kvp: Avoid reading past allocated blocks from KVP file
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 05:08:03PM -0700, Long Li wrote:
> > > From: Paul Meyer <Paul.Meyer@...rosoft.com>
> > >
> > > While reading in more than one block (50) of KVP records, the
> > > allocation goes per block, but the reads used the total number of
> > > allocated records (without resetting the pointer/stream). This causes
> > > the records buffer to overrun when the refresh reads more than one
> > > block over the previous capacity (e.g. reading more than 100 KVP records
> > whereas the in-memory database was empty before).
> >
> > Please wrap changelogs at 72 columns like your editor asked you to...
>
> I will fix it.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Fix this by reading the correct number of KVP records from file each time.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Meyer <Paul.Meyer@...rosoft.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Why is your name not also on the signed-off-by chain if you are forwarding on a
> > patch from someone else?
> >
> > Is this patch also needed on stable kernels?
>
> I'm sending on behalf of Paul Meyer. I will add a "Reviewed-by:" tag.
Sending on behalf means you should add your signed-off-by, as it is
going through you.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists