[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MWHPR21MB0190C9F2DCD0D34F2295D865CE5E0@MWHPR21MB0190.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 18:10:00 +0000
From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Meyer <Paul.Meyer@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] hv: kvp: Avoid reading past allocated blocks from KVP
file
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 1:43 AM
> To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang
> <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>;
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Paul Meyer
> <Paul.Meyer@...rosoft.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv: kvp: Avoid reading past allocated blocks from KVP file
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 05:08:03PM -0700, Long Li wrote:
> > From: Paul Meyer <Paul.Meyer@...rosoft.com>
> >
> > While reading in more than one block (50) of KVP records, the
> > allocation goes per block, but the reads used the total number of
> > allocated records (without resetting the pointer/stream). This causes
> > the records buffer to overrun when the refresh reads more than one
> > block over the previous capacity (e.g. reading more than 100 KVP records
> whereas the in-memory database was empty before).
>
> Please wrap changelogs at 72 columns like your editor asked you to...
I will fix it.
>
> >
> > Fix this by reading the correct number of KVP records from file each time.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Meyer <Paul.Meyer@...rosoft.com>
> > ---
>
> Why is your name not also on the signed-off-by chain if you are forwarding on a
> patch from someone else?
>
> Is this patch also needed on stable kernels?
I'm sending on behalf of Paul Meyer. I will add a "Reviewed-by:" tag.
Yes it should also go stable. Will send v2 to include that.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists