[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171031084248.GA11479@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 09:42:48 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Long Li <longli@...hange.microsoft.com>
Cc: "K . Y . Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Meyer <Paul.Meyer@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv: kvp: Avoid reading past allocated blocks from KVP
file
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 05:08:03PM -0700, Long Li wrote:
> From: Paul Meyer <Paul.Meyer@...rosoft.com>
>
> While reading in more than one block (50) of KVP records, the allocation goes
> per block, but the reads used the total number of allocated records (without
> resetting the pointer/stream). This causes the records buffer to overrun when
> the refresh reads more than one block over the previous capacity (e.g. reading
> more than 100 KVP records whereas the in-memory database was empty before).
Please wrap changelogs at 72 columns like your editor asked you to...
>
> Fix this by reading the correct number of KVP records from file each time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Meyer <Paul.Meyer@...rosoft.com>
> ---
Why is your name not also on the signed-off-by chain if you are
forwarding on a patch from someone else?
Is this patch also needed on stable kernels?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists