lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 1 Nov 2017 09:57:00 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <>
To:     Simon Horman <>,,
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <>,
        Laurent Pinchart <>,
        LKML <>,
Subject: Re: PCI: rcar: Use common error handling code in

> This is fine by me

Thanks for another bit of change acceptance.

> except that the change in the name of the goto label seems spurious.

I am curious if the popularity of a jump label like “err” will decrease
(in the Linux source files) over time.

> But if you really want to change it then as it is an error path
> I should suggest it describe that its an error and what unwinding
> is done, f.e.  err_remove_domain.

* Do you get such a kind of information only when the prefix “err_”
  is added to this identifier?

* Do you prefer to stress the “domain removal”
  (or the shown error message) in the label?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists