linux-kernel - Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in __do_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec9d483c-3151-4bfe-2e5b-9396afd84bab@suse.cz>
Date:   Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:14:45 +0100
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        syzbot 
        <bot+6a5269ce759a7bb12754ed9622076dc93f65a1f6@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in __do_page_fault

On 11/01/2017 11:17 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 08:42:57AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> The vma should be pinned by mmap_sem, but handle_userfault() will in some
>> scenarios release it and then acquire again, so when we return to
> 
> In the above message and especially in the below comment, I would
> suggest to take the opportunity to more accurately document the
> specific scenario instead of "some scenario" which is only "A return
> to userland to repeat the page fault later with a VM_FAULT_NOPAGE
> retval (potentially after handling any pending signal during the
> return to userland). The return to userland is identified whenever
> FAULT_FLAG_USER|FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE are both set in vmf->flags".

OK, updated patch below
----8<----
>From d72b9960310b959ccc2c211d90bc5215ee4560ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 08:21:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: fix use-after-free of vma during userfaultfd fault

Syzkaller with KASAN has reported a use-after-free of vma->vm_flags in
__do_page_fault() with the following reproducer:

mmap(&(0x7f0000000000/0xfff000)=nil, 0xfff000, 0x3, 0x32, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0)
mmap(&(0x7f0000011000/0x3000)=nil, 0x3000, 0x1, 0x32, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0)
r0 = userfaultfd(0x0)
ioctl$UFFDIO_API(r0, 0xc018aa3f, &(0x7f0000002000-0x18)={0xaa, 0x0, 0x0})
ioctl$UFFDIO_REGISTER(r0, 0xc020aa00, &(0x7f0000019000)={{&(0x7f0000012000/0x2000)=nil, 0x2000}, 0x1, 0x0})
r1 = gettid()
syz_open_dev$evdev(&(0x7f0000013000-0x12)="2f6465762f696e7075742f6576656e742300", 0x0, 0x0)
tkill(r1, 0x7)

The vma should be pinned by mmap_sem, but handle_userfault() might (in a return
to userspace scenario) release it and then acquire again, so when we return to
__do_page_fault() (with other result than VM_FAULT_RETRY), the vma might be
gone. Specifically, per Andrea the scenario is "A return to userland to repeat
the page fault later with a VM_FAULT_NOPAGE retval (potentially after handling
any pending signal during the return to userland). The return to userland is
identified whenever FAULT_FLAG_USER|FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE are both set in
vmf->flags"

However, since a3c4fb7c9c2e ("x86/mm: Fix fault error path using unsafe vma
pointer") there is a vma_pkey() read of vma->vm_flags after that point, which
can thus become use-after-free. Fix this by moving the read before calling
handle_mm_fault().

Reported-by: syzbot <bot+6a5269ce759a7bb12754ed9622076dc93f65a1f6@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Suggested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>
Fixes: 3c4fb7c9c2e ("x86/mm: Fix fault error path using unsafe vma pointer")
Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index e2baeaa053a5..7101c281c7ce 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -1440,7 +1440,17 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 	 * make sure we exit gracefully rather than endlessly redo
 	 * the fault.  Since we never set FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT, if
 	 * we get VM_FAULT_RETRY back, the mmap_sem has been unlocked.
+	 *
+	 * Note that handle_userfault() may also release and reacquire mmap_sem
+	 * (and not return with VM_FAULT_RETRY), when returning to userland to
+	 * repeat the page fault later with a VM_FAULT_NOPAGE retval
+	 * (potentially after handling any pending signal during the return to
+	 * userland). The return to userland is identified whenever
+	 * FAULT_FLAG_USER|FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE are both set in flags.
+	 * Thus we have to be careful about not touching vma after handling the
+	 * fault, so we read the pkey beforehand.
 	 */
+	pkey = vma_pkey(vma);
 	fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags);
 	major |= fault & VM_FAULT_MAJOR;
 
@@ -1467,7 +1477,6 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	pkey = vma_pkey(vma);
 	up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
 	if (unlikely(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR)) {
 		mm_fault_error(regs, error_code, address, &pkey, fault);
-- 
2.14.3