[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711011758170.1942@nanos>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 17:59:23 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] irqchip: mips-gic: Cleanups, fixes, prep for
multi-cluster
On Wed, 1 Nov 2017, Paul Burton wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 12:13:16AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 31 2017 at 9:41:43 am GMT, Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com> wrote:
> > > This series continues cleaning & fixing up the MIPS GIC irqchip driver
> > > whilst laying groundwork to support multi-cluster systems.
>
> <SNIP>
>
> > Are those targeting 4.14 or 4.15? It is getting quite late for the
> > former, and it doesn't seem to cleanly apply on tip/irq/core (or my
> > irqchip-4.15 branch) if that's for the latter (patch 6 shouts at me).
>
> Whichever you're happiest with. If you'd like me to rebase them & resubmit
> that's fine.
>
> I see the conflict with patch 6 atop tip/irq/core - it's because tip/irq/core
> is based upon v4.14-rc2 which doesn't have commit a08588ea486a
> ("irqchip/mips-gic: Fix shifts to extract register fields") that went into
> v4.14-rc3. The correct resolution is to keep the patches version of things (ie.
> delete the block of code).
Marc, simply merge current linus into your branch with the reason:
Pick up upstream fixes so dependent patches apply
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists