linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] irqchip: mips-gic: Cleanups, fixes, prep for multi-cluster

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87h8udufhc.fsf@on-the-bus.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 02 Nov 2017 10:44:47 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] irqchip: mips-gic: Cleanups, fixes, prep for multi-cluster

On Wed, Nov 01 2017 at  5:59:23 pm GMT, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2017, Paul Burton wrote:
>
>> Hi Marc,
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 12:13:16AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 31 2017 at 9:41:43 am GMT, Paul Burton
>> > <paul.burton@...s.com> wrote:
>> > > This series continues cleaning & fixing up the MIPS GIC irqchip driver
>> > > whilst laying groundwork to support multi-cluster systems.
>> 
>> <SNIP>
>> 
>> > Are those targeting 4.14 or 4.15? It is getting quite late for the
>> > former, and it doesn't seem to cleanly apply on tip/irq/core (or my
>> > irqchip-4.15 branch) if that's for the latter (patch 6 shouts at me).
>> 
>> Whichever you're happiest with. If you'd like me to rebase them & resubmit
>> that's fine.
>> 
>> I see the conflict with patch 6 atop tip/irq/core - it's because tip/irq/core
>> is based upon v4.14-rc2 which doesn't have commit a08588ea486a
>> ("irqchip/mips-gic: Fix shifts to extract register fields") that went into
>> v4.14-rc3. The correct resolution is to keep the patches version of
>> things (ie.
>> delete the block of code).
>
> Marc, simply merge current linus into your branch with the reason:
>
>       Pick up upstream fixes so dependent patches apply

Fair enough. I've now merged -rc3 in my branch, and applied those
without a hitch.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.