linux-kernel - [tip:x86/mpx] x86/insn-eval: Indicate a 32-bit displacement if ModRM.mod is 0 and ModRM.rm is 101b

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-e526a302e425ab11111efc5f59e52449bbcc768e@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 1 Nov 2017 14:01:39 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Ricardo Neri <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mst@...hat.com, cmetcalf@...lanox.com,
        paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, slaoub@...il.com,
        mhiramat@...nel.org, corbet@....net, vbabka@...e.cz,
        dvyukov@...gle.com, qiaowei.ren@...el.com, luto@...nel.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, bp@...e.de, hpa@...or.com,
        lstoakes@...il.com, acme@...hat.com, shuah@...nel.org,
        brgerst@...il.com, adam.buchbinder@...il.com,
        ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, jslaby@...e.cz, tglx@...utronix.de,
        thgarnie@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        adrian.hunter@...el.com, colin.king@...onical.com,
        ray.huang@....com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com
Subject: [tip:x86/mpx] x86/insn-eval: Indicate a 32-bit displacement if
 ModRM.mod is 0 and ModRM.rm is 101b

Commit-ID:  e526a302e425ab11111efc5f59e52449bbcc768e
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/e526a302e425ab11111efc5f59e52449bbcc768e
Author:     Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:25:44 -0700
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 21:50:13 +0100

x86/insn-eval: Indicate a 32-bit displacement if ModRM.mod is 0 and ModRM.rm is 101b

Section 2.2.1.3 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
Developer's Manual volume 2A states that when ModRM.mod is zero and
ModRM.rm is 101b, a 32-bit displacement follows the ModRM byte. This means
that none of the registers are used in the computation of the effective
address. A return value of -EDOM indicates callers that they should not
use the value of registers when computing the effective address for the
instruction.

In long mode, the effective address is given by the 32-bit displacement
plus the location of the next instruction. In protected mode, only the
displacement is used.

The instruction decoder takes care of obtaining the displacement.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: ricardo.neri@...el.com
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>
Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509135945-13762-18-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com

---
 arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
index 01e36bd..6bf819f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
@@ -427,6 +427,14 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
 	switch (type) {
 	case REG_TYPE_RM:
 		regno = X86_MODRM_RM(insn->modrm.value);
+
+		/*
+		 * ModRM.mod == 0 and ModRM.rm == 5 means a 32-bit displacement
+		 * follows the ModRM byte.
+		 */
+		if (!X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) && regno == 5)
+			return -EDOM;
+
 		if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value))
 			regno += 8;
 		break;
@@ -770,10 +778,21 @@ void __user *insn_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
 			eff_addr = base + indx * (1 << X86_SIB_SCALE(sib));
 		} else {
 			addr_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM);
-			if (addr_offset < 0)
+			/*
+			 * -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset.
+			 * In such a case, in 64-bit mode the effective address
+			 * relative to the RIP of the following instruction.
+			 */
+			if (addr_offset == -EDOM) {
+				if (user_64bit_mode(regs))
+					eff_addr = (long)regs->ip + insn->length;
+				else
+					eff_addr = 0;
+			} else if (addr_offset < 0) {
 				goto out;
-
-			eff_addr = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset);
+			} else {
+				eff_addr = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset);
+			}
 		}

 		eff_addr += insn->displacement.value;