linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.10 119/139] workqueue: implicit ordered attribute should be overridable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1509571624-5001-20-git-send-email-w@1wt.eu>
Date:   Wed,  1 Nov 2017 22:26:44 +0100
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Holger Hoffstätte 
        <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 119/139] workqueue: implicit ordered attribute should be overridable

From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

commit 0a94efb5acbb6980d7c9ab604372d93cd507e4d8 upstream.

5c0338c68706 ("workqueue: restore WQ_UNBOUND/max_active==1 to be
ordered") automatically enabled ordered attribute for unbound
workqueues w/ max_active == 1.  Because ordered workqueues reject
max_active and some attribute changes, this implicit ordered mode
broke cases where the user creates an unbound workqueue w/ max_active
== 1 and later explicitly changes the related attributes.

This patch distinguishes explicit and implicit ordered setting and
overrides from attribute changes if implict.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Fixes: 5c0338c68706 ("workqueue: restore WQ_UNBOUND/max_active==1 to be ordered")
Cc: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
---
 include/linux/workqueue.h |  4 +++-
 kernel/workqueue.c        | 13 +++++++++----
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 120dd35..4dab847 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ enum {
 
 	__WQ_DRAINING		= 1 << 16, /* internal: workqueue is draining */
 	__WQ_ORDERED		= 1 << 17, /* internal: workqueue is ordered */
+	__WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT	= 1 << 18, /* internal: alloc_ordered_workqueue() */
 
 	WQ_MAX_ACTIVE		= 512,	  /* I like 512, better ideas? */
 	WQ_MAX_UNBOUND_PER_CPU	= 4,	  /* 4 * #cpus for unbound wq */
@@ -408,7 +409,8 @@ __alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt, unsigned int flags, int max_active,
  * Pointer to the allocated workqueue on success, %NULL on failure.
  */
 #define alloc_ordered_workqueue(fmt, flags, args...)			\
-	alloc_workqueue(fmt, WQ_UNBOUND | __WQ_ORDERED | (flags), 1, ##args)
+	alloc_workqueue(fmt, WQ_UNBOUND | __WQ_ORDERED |		\
+			__WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT | (flags), 1, ##args)
 
 #define create_workqueue(name)						\
 	alloc_workqueue((name), WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 3f8558f..f55fbfa 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3399,7 +3399,7 @@ int workqueue_sysfs_register(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 	 * attributes breaks ordering guarantee.  Disallow exposing ordered
 	 * workqueues.
 	 */
-	if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED))
+	if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	wq->wq_dev = wq_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*wq_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -3964,8 +3964,12 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* creating multiple pwqs breaks ordering guarantee */
-	if (WARN_ON((wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED) && !list_empty(&wq->pwqs)))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!list_empty(&wq->pwqs)) {
+		if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		wq->flags &= ~__WQ_ORDERED;
+	}
 
 	pwq_tbl = kzalloc(wq_numa_tbl_len * sizeof(pwq_tbl[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
 	new_attrs = alloc_workqueue_attrs(GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -4411,13 +4415,14 @@ void workqueue_set_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int max_active)
 	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
 
 	/* disallow meddling with max_active for ordered workqueues */
-	if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED))
+	if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT))
 		return;
 
 	max_active = wq_clamp_max_active(max_active, wq->flags, wq->name);
 
 	mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
 
+	wq->flags &= ~__WQ_ORDERED;
 	wq->saved_max_active = max_active;
 
 	for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
-- 
2.8.0.rc2.1.gbe9624a