[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1509571600-4858-24-git-send-email-w@1wt.eu>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 22:26:14 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...ck-us.net
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 073/139] ext4: in ext4_seek_{hole,data}, return -ENXIO for negative offsets
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
commit 1bd8d6cd3e413d64e543ec3e69ff43e75a1cf1ea upstream.
In the ext4 implementations of SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA, make sure we
return -ENXIO for negative offsets instead of banging around inside
the extent code and returning -EFSCORRUPTED.
Reported-by: Mateusz S <muttdini@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
---
fs/ext4/file.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
index dfba7b3..ed2bada 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/file.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static loff_t ext4_seek_data(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t maxsize)
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
isize = i_size_read(inode);
- if (offset >= isize) {
+ if (offset < 0 || offset >= isize) {
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
return -ENXIO;
}
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static loff_t ext4_seek_hole(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t maxsize)
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
isize = i_size_read(inode);
- if (offset >= isize) {
+ if (offset < 0 || offset >= isize) {
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
return -ENXIO;
}
--
2.8.0.rc2.1.gbe9624a
Powered by blists - more mailing lists