[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171101221709.GB28761@minitux>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:17:09 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailbox: add support for doorbell/signal mode controllers
On Wed 01 Nov 11:15 PDT 2017, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
> 80 writel_relaxed(msg->cmd, mb->mbox_base +
> MAILBOX_A2B_CMD(chans->idx));
> 81 writel_relaxed(msg->rx_size, mb->mbox_base +
>
> 82 MAILBOX_A2B_DAT(chans->idx));
>
> 83
This is just terrible, using the void *mssg to pass a struct which is
interpreted by the controller removes any form of abstraction provided
by the framework.
In my view the void *mssg should point to the data to be written in the
mailbox register, and hence might be of different size - but only of
native type.
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists