lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 23:20:34 +0100 From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org CC: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][net-next] net: sched: cls_bpf: use bitwise & rather than logical && on gen_flags On 11/02/2017 09:04 PM, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> > > Currently gen_flags is being operated on by a logical && operator rather > than a bitwise & operator. This looks incorrect as these should be bit > flag operations. Fix this. > > Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1460305 ("Logical vs. bitwise operator") > > Fixes: 3f7889c4c79b ("net: sched: cls_bpf: call block callbacks for offload) > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists