lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 02 Nov 2017 23:20:34 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][net-next] net: sched: cls_bpf: use bitwise & rather than
 logical && on gen_flags

On 11/02/2017 09:04 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Currently gen_flags is being operated on by a logical && operator rather
> than a bitwise & operator. This looks incorrect as these should be bit
> flag operations. Fix this.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1460305 ("Logical vs. bitwise operator")
>
> Fixes: 3f7889c4c79b ("net: sched: cls_bpf: call block callbacks for offload)
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists