[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLJY_zYf=v_xYUEG6tgLzwvW8P+-d9GNNp8XN5bhnWvzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:36:53 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:27:37 -0700
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>>
>> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ibm.com>
>> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
>> Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 10 +++++-----
>> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Parked for the second part of the s390 updates for the next merge window.
> Thanks.
Thanks for getting these staged. I just wanted to check with you,
since I don't see these in -next anywhere yet:
s390: qdio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
s390/sclp: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
Are all of these expected to land for -rc1? (Would it help to carry
them in the timer tree?) I've got tree-wide changes ready to go once
all these conversions have landed.
Thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists