lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:29:26 +0100
From:   Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:36:53 -0700
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
> <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:27:37 -0700
> > Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> >  
> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
> >>
> >> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ibm.com>
> >> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
> >> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> >> Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c   | 10 +++++-----
> >>  drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h   |  2 +-
> >>  drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c |  2 +-
> >>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)  
> >
> > Parked for the second part of the s390 updates for the next merge window.
> > Thanks.  
> 
> Thanks for getting these staged. I just wanted to check with you,
> since I don't see these in -next anywhere yet:
> 
> s390: qdio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> s390/sclp: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> 
> Are all of these expected to land for -rc1? (Would it help to carry
> them in the timer tree?) I've got tree-wide changes ready to go once
> all these conversions have landed.

These patches are parked on a private branches. The features branch
on s390/linux is the one that is used for -next AND for the upstream
merge. And since I do not want to rebase that branch the timer_setup
patches are not in -next as well. 

Four of you patches are safe with me, the s390/scsi patch is in
Steffens patch queue. All good I would say.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists