linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipmi tree with the modules tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2017 08:31:23 -0500
From:   Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
To:     Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipmi tree with the modules tree

On 11/01/2017 10:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Corey,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the ipmi tree got a conflict in:
>
>    drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>
> between commit:
>
>    e4dca7b7aa08 ("treewide: Fix function prototypes for module_param_call()")
>
> from the modules tree and commit:
>
>    44814ec982d2 ("ipmi_si: Move the hotmod handling to another file.")
>
> from the ipmi tree.

Thanks Stephen.

Kees, do you have a tree I can merge so we can avoid this going upstream?

-corey

> I fixed it up (I used the ipmi tree version of the file and added the
> following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:55:01 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] ipmi_si: merge fix for "treewide: Fix function prototypes for
>   module_param_call()"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
>   drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_hotmod.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_hotmod.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_hotmod.c
> index da5716159974..fc03b9be2f3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_hotmod.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_hotmod.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
>   
>   #define PFX "ipmi_hotmod: "
>   
> -static int hotmod_handler(const char *val, struct kernel_param *kp);
> +static int hotmod_handler(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp);
>   
>   module_param_call(hotmod, hotmod_handler, NULL, NULL, 0200);
>   MODULE_PARM_DESC(hotmod, "Add and remove interfaces.  See"
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static int check_hotmod_int_op(const char *curr, const char *option,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -static int hotmod_handler(const char *val, struct kernel_param *kp)
> +static int hotmod_handler(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
>   {
>   	char *str = kstrdup(val, GFP_KERNEL);
>   	int  rv;