[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171102133200.abwvepjx3ytufsc4@treble>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 08:32:00 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc: jeyu@...nel.org, jikos@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com,
lpechacek@...e.cz, pavel@....cz, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] livepatch: send a fake signal to all blocking
tasks
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:48:52PM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> index bf8c8fd72589..b7c60662baf3 100644
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> @@ -440,6 +440,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(klp_enable_patch);
> * /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>
> * /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/enabled
> * /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/transition
> + * /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/signal
> * /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/<object>
> * /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/<object>/<function,sympos>
> */
> @@ -514,11 +515,37 @@ static ssize_t transition_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> patch == klp_transition_patch);
> }
>
> +static ssize_t signal_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + bool val;
> +
> + /*
> + * klp_mutex lock is not grabbed here intentionally. It is not really
> + * needed. The race window is harmless and grabbing the lock would only
> + * hold the action back.
> + */
> + if (!klp_transition_patch)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = kstrtobool(buf, &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (val)
> + klp_force_signals();
> +
> + return count;
> +}
The function still has global functionality even though the sysfs entry
is now per-patch. So if you do
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/livepatch/patch1/signal
But patch2 is in transition, then it will send signals based on patch2.
Instead it should probably return an error.
There's a similar issue with force_store().
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists