linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] bus: add driver for the Technologic Systems NBUS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <99814e77-cc83-23be-21f2-04898695fc15@savoirfairelinux.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2017 12:10:27 -0400
From:   Sebastien Bourdelin <sebastien.bourdelin@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel <kernel@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Mark Featherston <mark@...eddedarm.com>, kris@...eddedarm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] bus: add driver for the Technologic Systems NBUS


On 11/02/2017 11:57 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Sebastien Bourdelin
> <sebastien.bourdelin@...oirfairelinux.com> wrote:
> 
>>> BTW do you have a way upstream for this patch? ARM SoC?
>>
>> Honestly i have no idea, do you have a recommandation for this kind of
>> bus driver? should i re-submit just this patch to a specific tree?
> 
> If this is for an ARM system I would suggest that you just sent
> the patches to arm@...nel.org with CC to the linux-arm-kernel
> mailing list and ask the ARM SoC maintainers to apply them directly
> for the upstream kernel.
> 
Ok, i will, thanks again!

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> 

Best Regards,
Sebastien Bourdelin.