[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf0cc77c-6114-74d3-2342-b9c4a55f6800@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 12:06:24 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@...il.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM281XX/BCM11XXX/BCM216XX ARM ARCHITE..."
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] bcm63xx-rng conversion to bcm2835-rng
Hi Stefan,
On 11/02/2017 12:01 PM, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
>> Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> hat am 2. November 2017 um 02:03 geschrieben:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As it usually happens when there is a fair amount of HW IP block re-use,
>> competing implementations show up. In that case the BCM2835 HWRNG driver and
>> the BCM63xx RNG driver have exactly the same register offsets and this is
>> indeed the same piece of HW.
>>
>> This patch series first prepares the bcm2835-rng to be more future proof and
>> support newer platforms, and the last part brings in what is necessary to
>> migrate the bcm63xx-rng over to bcm2835-rng. Finally we delete bcm63xx-rng
>> completely.
>>
>> The reason why BCM2835 RNG was kept over BCM63xx RNG is because the former
>> deals correctly with a warm up count and the number of words available in the
>> FIFO size.
>
> are these the same patches as in this branch [1]?
>
> https://github.com/ffainelli/linux/commits/rng-consolidation
Yes, this branch contains these 12 patches.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists