lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 21:30:11 +0000 From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, matthew.garrett@...ula.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jforbes@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/27] Enforce module signatures if the kernel is locked down Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > By this point, IMA-appraisal has already verified the kernel module > signature back in kernel_read_file_from_fd(), if it was required. > Having a key with which to verify the appended signature or requiring > an appended signature, should not be required as well. I guess I don't need to put in any support for IMA here, then, and you've taken care of it in your patchset such that it won't actually go into module_sig_check() in that case (or will at least return immediately). David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists