[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171103133414.GA14463@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 06:34:14 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: watchdog: f71808e_wdt: mark expected switch fall-throughs
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 02:28:17PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
> "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
> index 8658dba..e0678c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
> @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static long watchdog_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>
> if (new_options & WDIOS_ENABLECARD)
> return watchdog_start();
> -
> + /* fall through */
>
> case WDIOC_KEEPALIVE:
> watchdog_keepalive();
> @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ static long watchdog_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> watchdog_keepalive();
> - /* Fall */
> + /* fall through */
>
> case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
> return put_user(watchdog.timeout, uarg.i);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists